hello to
everyone everyone from around the world
today uh I'd like to take a moment to
thank our UCLA
co-sponsors the narian center for Israel
studies and the luskan department of
public policy for helping us spread the
word about this
event uh I also want to point out that
our original Israeli speaker ahu
jari uh has come down with um uh a
temporary illness with a very bad cold
Etc and um we miss
him but we also want to thank Nimrod for
his uh coming in the very last
minute uh and for some here who was such
a sport about all of our uh changes
now uh to begin with I have uh uh uh one
of the hardest part of this meeting uh
to uh follow important
information which means it's very hard
to make this exciting even though I will
try uh first while you can see us we
cannot see or hear you second we are
recording the presentation today and the
video will be available on the CED
website YouTube and our Facebook uh page
as soon as possible three if you are
joining us using Zoom please notice the
the Chad window at the bottom of the
screen take a look we will share
announcements during the talk with you
uh in the chat window however you will
not be able to add comments in the chat
box if you have questions for our
speakers or
speaker uh depending what it is please
type uh the questions or the question in
the Q&A window also at the bottom of
your
screen be sure to include your name in
your country and or affiliation and note
then your
name Country and or affiliation will be
announced aloud along with your
question only the cat team will be able
to see your questions in some cases we
will answer questions in writing in the
Q&A window for others to see please keep
questions concise so we can answer as
many questions as possible and
finally uh in this uh section if you are
joining us on the YouTube platform
please note you will not be able to ask
a question because comments will be
disabled and now for my uh last point of
opening uh I want to introduce our
moderator today Professor Steve
zipperstein uh he is the newly uh
usually appointed associate
director of our effort uh and uh he will
be working uh with me with a wide
variety of uh uh new programs and
efforts of the UCLA Center for Middle
East development which makes it possible
uh whenever we have this kind of
addition uh I will take a deep breath
Professor zipperstein is a former US
Federal prosecutor and the former Chief
legal officer of Verizon Wireless and
blackberry LTD
is the author of the legal case for
Palestine a critical assessment which is
forthcoming from uh rigin this year I
think it's closer than that uh Zionism
Palestinian nationalism and the law 1939
to 1948 a also rage in 2022 and law and
the Arab Israeli conflict the trials of
Palestine rage
2020 and so ladies and gentlemen Steve
ziin thank you so much Professor Spiegel
pleasure to be with all of you thank you
all for joining us for what I promise
will be a very interesting webinar with
two fantastic speakers joining us here's
what we're going to do I'm going to
introduce both both speakers then I will
ask each of them to speak uh in the form
of opening comments for roughly seven
minutes each as they are speaking please
be thinking of questions that you would
like me to ask them
on your behalf as Professor Spiegel said
please type those questions into the Q&A
box at the bottom of your Zoom screen I
want to get as many of your questions in
as possible we'll go for about an hour
and a half or so and and see where it
takes us so uh without further Ado let
me introduce both speakers uh as Steve
Spiegel said uh very very uh privileged
to be joined this evening by Dr Nimrod
novic who stepped in at the last minute
thank you so much Dr novic Dr novic is
former senior policy advisor to prime
minister Shimon Perez special Ambassador
and adviser to the National Security
Council of Israel he's also a member of
a very important or a very important
organization called commanders for
Israel's security an organization of
about 550 former IDF generals as well as
mosad Shin betet police National
Security Council and Foreign Service
equivalents Dr novic also serves as the
Israel fellow of the Israel policy Forum
a bipartisan American Jewish
organization active in Washington DC he
has worked as past chair and is the
current senior fellow at the economic
cooperation Foundation an NGO that
launched the Oslo process and has ever
since been involved in All Phases of the
Israeli Palestinian negotiations Dr
novic also has extensive experience in
back channnel diplomacy employing a wide
network of security and diplomatic
contacts in the region and Beyond we're
also very very honored this afternoon to
be joined by Sam Abdul razak s sini who
is Chairman of the Jerusalem Development
Fund and a fatak political activist from
Jerusalem he is an opponent of
Palestinian Authority president Mahmud
Abbas uh indicated most notably in a
recent article in the New York Times in
oped authored by suir entitled quote
Mahmud abas must go Samir belongs to a
young Palestinian leadership uh
generation believing in the need to
focus on intensive dialogue and bridge
building with Israelis and to that end
he's invested extensive time in
discussions with Israelis from all walks
of a political life left Cent Center and
right he is the most invited Palestinian
to appear on Israeli television and
Israeli media recently Channel 13 and
Israel interviewed some together with
former prime minister Barack uh with
Former Defense Minister boji ayone and
with us former Envoy Dennis Ross on
questions regarding what will happen in
Gaza the day after the war so Samir I'm
going to start with you the floor is
yours for seven minutes thank you so
much for being with us everyone please
questions well thank you very much
Professor Steve bin and I have the honor
to be here I would like to thank also uh
professor swel and the team of the
center for the Middle East development
usla for organizing this
event uh I will start
by briefly introducing myself uh um I am
a
mainstream
Palestinian uh political activist I
started my political life very early at
the age of 14 as a kid of of the anti
father who was throwing stones at that
time spent 5 years in Israeli jails and
that's where I learned my Hebrew and I
think it was very
useful my Hebrew skills has allowed me
to communicate in a very easy way to
most of the Israelis that I know and
when I was released it was also
agreement the doors were open when I was
out for more communication with the
Israeli side I was elected as the
international secretary for fat Youth
and there we started talking to the
labor youth the party of the late uh
prime minister Rabin 96 when there was a
change in power we continue talking to
Theus and I contined this habit until
today so investing
around
33 years of my life into talking to the
Israelis I think it was the best
investment that I have done in my life
and it is a learning
care it allows you to start
understanding the conflict
from the eyes of the other
side
and taking this experience is very
important to start trying to find ways
out of this
conflict and uh I believe it applies
also to the other side when Israelis
start looking at this conflict from the
eyes of Palestinians it will help a lot
understanding better this
conflict uh I believe that any political
road that might lead to political
Horizons for us as Palestinians will not
pass through Washington DC or London or
Paris or Berlin or Cairo it passes only
through Tel Aviv we Palestinians we will
be capable and able to find out a way
that will lead to a progress politically
open political Horizons only when we are
able to touch the minds and the hearts
of the Israelis I discovered through
this long process of talking to the
other side that we are not necessar the
problem to each other I think we are
certainly the solution to each other if
we look deep into the roots of this
conflict we can see
that if we don't discuss the solid
issues of the conflict we always focus
on this conflict by discussing borders
Jerusalem refugees security issues if we
go and look at the nonsolid issues of
this conflict in particular for example
the
narratives as far as we have two
narratives that are fighting each others
it will be very difficult for
Palestinians and Israelis to find out a
way but if we look at both narratives I
think with minor modifications on the
two narratives we can have a joint
narrative for both Israelis and
Palestinians and that's where we will be
able to find Easy Way easy solutions to
the solid
issues for us as Palestinians we
need to be
confident in announcing that Jews have
historical rights in
Palestine or you can call it Israel the
whole
land Hebron nais the
laiv but we need to remind the
Israelis
that they have never been alone here
there was always others and these others
are
us if we had this common history
together we should be able to find a
common future
together and even I don't agree with the
Zionism version of of the narrative that
Jews has left the land waited for
thousands of years and they came back my
grandfather told me stories about his
Jewish partner in a small shop of cloths
in the old cities early uh last
century and this is an example that
there has been always continuously Jews
in this land maybe sometimes they were
majority sometimes they were minority
but their relation did not disconnect
from the land the same our relation to
this land has never
disconnected the main challenges the
main enemies for Israelis and
Palestinians is ignorance unfortunately
we don't know each others very
well hatred incitement are two other men
enemies that
these three enemies together should be
fought and it needs a lot of leadership
and wisdom something that maybe both
Palestinians and Israelis currently lack
maybe for us as Palestinians we couldn't
find leadership in the last 100 years
you can imagine
that 100 years ago we have been together
with the Israelis group of militias
fighting each other and fighting the
British mandate to today Israel became
OED country with a lot of achievements
and we have
stayed as Palestinians as group of
militias unfortunately until now and if
if you ask me why I'll tell you lack of
leadership we have had three leaders in
years the MU husseini thenat and then
Abbas three leaders in 100 years none of
them left us with REM remarkable
achievements
so lack of leadership from the
Palestinian side is is is very
important I spent these years into
talking to all Israelis in left in
Center in right and I joke sometimes
with the Israelis and I tell them I know
you better than you know yourselves
because I talk to all of you and you
don't talk to each other so when some of
my friends see me going to the studios
of Channel 14 they get crazy and they
asked me how can you go
there I definitely need to talk to the
right and to the extreme right in Israel
it's a constituency big enough that we
cannot neglect we need to talk we need
to communicate and we need to convince
and when my right-wing Israelis see me
in Channel 11 or 13 also they tell me
why do you go there they are becoming
part of the museum they are irrelevant
now every Israeli is important for us
and we need to communicate with
everybody we need to communicate with
the Israeli through media in Academia
with the political Elite we need to talk
to everybody and each time I talk to
Israeli I discover that the current
political Elite in Israel they have
almost never contacted or discussed
politics with Palestinians including
ministers into this government so
changes starts with dialogue with
communication with changing the
narrative we Palestinians need to adapt
to a strategy that puts at its bases out
of national interest Palestinian
national interest the security Israeli
needs and Israelis need to adapt to a
strategy that puts at the basis of it
out of Israeli own interest the
Palestinian Prosperity progress National
aspiration and from there these two
strategies needs to work and and
compliment each other they will help to
achieve the Israeli security needs and
the Palestinian national aspiration
needs there is a way if we start working
together we can be there and in no time
I can tell you something about the
Palestinian people regardless all the
polls that you keep reading about the
Palestinian people is a very moderate
people and they we can change the public
opinion very quickly me myself when I
was in jail I started my political life
believing that I need to flee Palestine
from The River To The Sea and then in 88
when President Arafat announced the
Declaration of Independence saying that
our Target is a state on the borders of
67 we have celebrated this shifted
automatically and when I went out in the
93 he himself Arafat signed autonomy
agreement in Gaza and Jericho for this
also we were very happy and shifted and
signed in a real Palestinian leadership
can shift the public opinion towards
moderation towards bramis towards
accepting dialogue and
coexistence so the immediate challenge
of the Palestinian people is changing
leadership this is the challenge that is
facing up we need to have abas lead the
political scene allow
younger political leaders to assume
power change the Palestinian Society
into more democratic change the
leadership into a transparent and
accountable leadership engaging with the
Israelis working with the Israelis not
against the Israelis similar changes are
expected to happen on the Israeli side
that's where when Israelis and
Palestinians can start working to the
together and that's where in no time we
can find a way out of this conflict okay
that was incredible I didn't cut you at
seven minutes because your remarks were
so profoundly
important um and I think that your
comment at the end about the need for
leadership changes on both sides is a
great segue to NR noic and so I'm going
to turn the floor over to you and I'll
give you 10 minutes the same amount of
time that suir just took please 10
minutes thank you very much and thank
you for having me and uh I wish if he's
watching full and speedy
recovery um I feel almost
uncomfortable um shifting from the
compelling Vision uh that Sumer
presented which I share
wholeheartedly uh to the harsh reality
uh of where we are at the moment before
we have the two respective changes of
leadership uh that he and I uh uh
aspired to
see um and I'd like to start with a
comment uh to the audience from 30
different parts of the globe that are
with us now uh by saying that there is a
basic
disconnect between what you see and what
you uh uh think of what's going on in
Gaza and what we
Israelis um
experience complete
disconnect um I will not describe what
uh what you see and what you think you
know better than I but I will describe
very briefly uh what's going on in
Israel here uh we are not on the day
202 from October
7 we are
mentally uh in October 8th
um we're not in a post
traumatic uh what's the term for it
syndrome uh we are still in the in the
trauma uh
itself uh this is the result of the fact
that
1333 of our citizens are still uh in the
tunnels in Gaza uh this is because we on
a daily basis almost hourly basis um are
exposed to the story of the victims of
Hamas brutality of October 7th uh the
heroic uh the heroism of individuals who
came to the rescue the trauma from the
failure of the Israeli Defense Forces to
anticipate and address uh the assault um
and the far more profound failure of our
political leadership whose wrong
strategy of over a decade
um of strengthening Hamas in Gaza and
weakening the Palestinian Authority on
the West Bank has brought us to this
point and today uh when we are uh in in
month seven of the War uh that most
Israelis is not anticipated will last
more than
weeks um we look around and none of the
objectives set for for it have been
fully
accomplished um the IDF has performed as
well as any army worldwide under
circumstances that are
unprecedented uh people compare it to
what the US forces faced uh in certain
places in Iraq in
Afghanistan uh but even the American
generals who were there um confess that
this is far more complicated and
challenging uh given the uh
circumstances in
Gaza uh so the ibf the ipf can perform
as well as any
army uh but as the saying in the Navy
goes uh if you don't know where you're
going no wind will get you
there and uh the government and here is
the almost a mirror image of what summer
was talking about the Palestinian side
uh the government not only failed us PRI
to October 7th and not only failed the
victims since October 7th has failed to
articulate serious objectives for the
war what we hear are empty
slogans such as total Victory and
Destroy
Hamas um which cannot be
translated into any political outcome
that the IDF is supposed to uh prepare
the ground
for and if that's not bad enough then
suddenly those who had not realized it
from the
outset now
recognize that we are
stuck we are stuck in
Gaza and we are
facing a stark
choice between two
options and you know
sometimes a cliche
is not an empty simplification of
reality but
truth I've been around long
enough um Samir started at
14 I started at a later age at
21 but since I'm older I've been in this
business
longer um I don't remember a moment
where Israel faced a more faithful
choice
between two
options one
option which I'm afraid we're are
sliding
towards is an
open-ended ever
conflicted
open uh ended occupation of the Gaza
Strip which if
materializes is not only does not only
sentence gazin and his Israelis to
further
misery but is likely to affect Dynamics
on the West Bank as
well and if that
continues we may see gike situation on
the West Bank as
well and with that
happening the peace
countries near and far the original one
Egypt and Jordan and the new
newcomers the UAE Bahrain
Morocco uh distancing themselves
normalization with Saudi Arabia will go
into the file of missed
opportunities and we will be even more
isolated
worldwide that is one course the other
one has been suggested by President
Biden on behalf of a group of Arab
countries likeminded
that are offering us an unprecedented
historic
opportunity they offer us three win
situation win number one is to help
extract ourselves out of Gaza and
replace Us by their own
management interim
management the second win is to offer
Palestinians an alternative to the
brutal Hamas
ideology by a political Horizon that
leads to exactly the same the place
where Samir is dreaming
about and the third one is integrating
Israel into a origional
coalition that contributes to the
prosperity of
all and is designed also to check
Iranian meddling as well as its
proxies however this second option the
very attractive one has two
prerequisites one is for Israel to
accept a role for the Palestinian
Authority in Gaza as well that's the
insistence of those who are willing to
come to the rescue basically what our
countries are telling us is that they
are willing to come but not as
occupiers but as somebody invit Ed by
the legitimate representative of the
Palestinian
people the Palestinian Authority and the
PLO the second prerequisite is those
same Arab countries are not willing to
see and other donors from the West are
not what are not willing to see their
contribution to R to Gaza
Rehabilitation and development go up in
flames in the next round of Israeli
Palestinian Israeli Gaza Israeli H uh
war and in order to try and secure that
nothing is guaranteed but in order to
try and secure that you need to see what
is now called a credible
irreversible time bound path to the
two-state
solution
alas here we come to Summer's uh uh
Point as it applies to us our current
leadership will not hear of these two
conditions our current leadership is
still under the illusion or at least it
says so that those Arab and Western
donors will come anyway even if Israel
rejects the role for the Palestinian
Authority in Gaza and reject the idea of
a two-state solution at the end of the
road which is not going to
happen we're I would say the Gaza today
is stuck in
Jerusalem and until we're going to have
a major change of
policy which is likely requiring a major
change of
government we are
sliding into their
abast okay thank you NR so we had very
very I would say
um wonderfully thoughtful
vision from some era of what could be NE
Ro focused on some of the harsh
realities that we're confronting and
this really leads to uh the first round
of questions and I hope that all of you
in the audience are inspired now to ask
a lot of questions we have some already
uh the first is from me since I'm the
moderator I'm going to use the privilege
of the microphone to ask the first
question but I'm going to ask that my
question along with two others at the
same time and both of you I'll give some
time five minutes seven minutes whatever
you need to address these questions
however you want to my question relates
uh to the title of the webinar and some
are you already addressed this very
eloquently the title of this webinar is
what is possible when Israelis and
Palestinians work together and my
question is are we assuming too much
with that title
maybe we should be asking in light of
what has happened on October the 7th and
ever since leading up to where we are
right now
can Israelis and Palestinians work
together in the current environment so
that's the first question from me the
second question is from um Mr Mayer from
the United States who is asking Samir to
go into a little bit more detail about
the disconnect in the polling data from
the West Bank showing enormous support
for Hamas and the comment that you
mentioned that leadership new leadership
can uh take that apparent public opinion
if it's accurate if the polls are
accurate and maybe take it into a
different direction is that possible if
you could just give us some more detail
on that because Mr Mayor is is concerned
polls are saying one thing you seem to
be saying something else so how do we
reconcile that and then uh the third in
this series questions is from my
wonderful colleague at UCLA brilliant
scholar Warren famy who asks on the
ground level what are the possible
avenues for building positive peopt
people relations between Israelis and
Palestinians how do we build trust on
the ground on the ground given the
current War how long do you both feel it
will take to mend fences among the
general populace the general population
on both sides so sumir I'll turn it over
to you you can address one or all three
of them or whatever you'd like to
do well I hope seven minutes will be
okay but I will try my
best well I would like to start by
saying
that I know that the Israelis we knew
before the 7th of October are not the
Israelis we have known the shock the
trauma of 7th of October was huge and we
should realize this but yet resulting to
the slogan of War of no
choice wasn't really
the wise option even with all the pain
all all with all the atrocities that
have been done on the 7th of October and
I myself I was maybe
the only Palestinians that had the
condolences visit to the envelope of
Gaza I condemn this and I think what has
happened there cannot represent the
Palestinians but yet I think if we had
had very wise leaders on both
sides they would have turned to a slogan
of Peace of no choice we have resulted
to war and violence both sides
for the last 75 years and it did not
help we've tried once the oso agreement
and it did not succeed and we give up
then we said it doesn't work but we
tried every year every month every day
security tactics military options
violence we reached to a level that both
sides started believing that everything
is permissible to be done on the other
side and unfortunately we crossed a lot
of moral red lines in in this conflict
and on the 7th of October we could have
thought in the direction of Peace of no
choice but we are where we are now yet
when this war
ends Palestinians and Israelis will go
back to reality we will continue to live
and exist together on this land 7
million Jews 7 million Palestinians and
we will discover that we have no other
choice but to find a way of goist this
with the heavy price that everybody is
paying now and it is very happy price
and I trained
myself to not have hard feelings with
Israelis despite all the very difficult
images that goes out of gansa because at
the same time we are also causing Herm
and when I say we it doesn't mean myself
but we as Palestinians collectively
whatever is has happened on the 7th of
October is also in a moral legal and
political responsibility of any
Palestinians and whatever is happening
in Gaza now also should be of a moral
legal and political responsibility of
every Israelis we need to decide how to
look at it when when the war ends but we
will have no other choice but to work
together away out for the
polls and to work the way out I
think we should not limit Our intention
to remove Hamas only from the political
scene I think three people there is a
triangle of three sides if any of of
them if we are stuck with any of them we
will not be able to move ahead it's
Hamas abas and and I think I will allow
myself also to say the current prime
minister in Israel if we are stuck off
with any of them we will not be able to
move alone if we need Hamas if we need
Gaza without Hamas we need to start
having the West Bank without
abas without this we cannot unlock the
current situation we will not be able to
provide the Israelis with security
Arrangements
that will convince them to withdraw from
Gaza security Arrangements means
somebody need to come and fill the
vacuum of of of
Hamas Abbas will not be able to enter
Gaza because Gaza is more hostile to
abasan it is hostile to Israel
unfortunately 90% of the Palestinians
are requesting this person to leave the
political
scene we are fed up of two things most
of the Palestinians and I will connect
this to the
polls Palestinians are fed up from the
corruption that Abbas has brought upon
them in the West Bank and they are fed
up from the dis destruction that Hamas
has brought upon them in Gaza most of
the Palestinians would like to see a way
where a Palestinian leadership will
provide them with a path of construction
of Hope currently every Palestinian
wakes up in the morning and he's
confident that today will be worse than
yesterday if this feeling change into
optimistic one a feeling of believing
that today is going to be better than
yesterday the whole Dynamics will
change I I am not a fan of Paul's during
times of tragedy I don't want to test
the feelings of Israelis today and I
don't want anybody to test the feelings
of Palestinians today especially when
the questions in the polls are tricky
when you come and ask question to a
Palestinian do you
support the 7th of October it is
interpreted for most of the
Palestinians are you
supporting the war on the Palestinians
on Gaza or the opposite of it but if you
ask the Palestinian do you support
killing civilians kidnapping babies and
wom and elderly people to Gaza 90% of
the Palestinians will tell you no if you
ask the
Palestinians do you prefer a war a
continuous military and violent
engagement with Israelis or a path of
peace and progress where the Israelis
are committed to changing the life of
the Palestinians and opening Horizons to
a political solution they will choose
the letter so in a way
the polls are not accurate we are
testing the feelings of the people
during a time that they have a cocktail
of feelings anger revenge is there
hatred is there pain is there grief is
there on both sides and it's it's
legitimate seeing 1,200 bodies in one
day is very harsh for the Israelis and
seeing the images that are going from
Gaza is very hard for the Palestinians
so
I think if a Palestinian leadership
comes and offers the
Palestinians a pragmatic way to change
their lives they will all sign in but we
cannot do it alone Hamas didn't need a
partner from inside Israel to implement
their strategies we the Democratic
Progressive
moderate who believe in coexistence with
Israel we need a partner and and I think
also those who believe in the option of
solving politically diplomatically the
conflict inside Israel also they need a
real partner from the Palestinian
side the raise of one side if one
leadership from one side will become so
confident and working hard towards a
diplomatic option
sincerely then it will have impact on
the other side that's why
changing Abbas removing Abbas from the
political reality of the Palestinians
will help in creating some strong impact
and I can see from my own dialogue from
my own connections and I will link this
to the People to People
issue I believe since we don't have a
lot of time maybe the Israelis have the
leverage of waiting another 20 30 40
years until having the conditions ready
for a political Solutions we don't have
this privilege there is an issue of
urgency on the Palestinian side I am
a 52 years old until now I am not a
citizen of any state I cannot be a
citizen of Israel I don't have a
Palestinian state to be a citizen the
lack of citizenship is something that we
cannot survive with the LW so I I
believe that a conciliation
Reconciliation process trust building
process should be implemented top bottom
we should now create immediately ties
and connections between the future
political Elite in Palestine the shadow
leadership and the future political
Elite in Israel or the current ones I
think we are able to work with any
leader that might replace Netanyahu
is laid gun Eisen cot Benet
yosan you name it left center right we
know these people we are able to work
with them we are capable to work with
them we need to create more bridges
between the elites and then take this
process down the reconciliation the
trust should be built up and we take it
down and I think both Israelis and
Palestinians will sign into this process
if we start dealing with two important
issues first we need to revise our
education system on both sides we need
to eliminate all kinds of incitement and
hatred maybe we have this problem more
obvious on the Palestinian side less
obvious in the Israeli side but it
exists on both sides maybe it is in the
textbook on the Palestinian side but it
is on
the climate on the discussion of the
classrooms in the Israeli side and then
the media we should change the media the
media now in Israel and Palestine only
talks about the bad issues of the other
side we should starting talking about
the good issues on the other side with
these tools we will be able to change
the public opinion very
quickly okay wow again thank you uh
brilliant
analysis a lot for us to think about I'm
seeing some more questions come in and
anima before I turn it to you I hope you
don't mind but I'm going to add one
question that just came in that is quite
interesting and I think that it is
directed more at you although some feel
free on your next round to address this
as well this is from Anor in Canada and
she's asking or she writes the following
the dream of working together seems
impossible under the profoundly
self-serving leadership of the current
Israeli government and an is asking why
is Netanyahu still in office why do
Israelis who disapprove of him take no
decisive action to remove him so I'll
add that to the first three questions NE
Ro the floor is
yours thank you very much um to the
question of whether Israelis and
Palestinians can
cooperate um if those pictures behind me
uh over my shoulder are they are too
small for you to see and I hope summer
doesn't hold it against me uh these are
pictures of Abu Mazen and Muhammad dlan
and Hassan asur
and uh
saat God bless his soul at the uh dinner
in my
home um during the Heyday of the Oslo
process um we were working together even
to the point of jointly
conspiring how to
maneuver arat on the one hand and our
prime minister on the
other
um I believe that uh the Palestinian
leadership of the time was quite
different from the one that summer would
like to see gone
today uh because I think that Abu maadan
himself has underwent drastic changes
over the decades something there's
something to be said for term
limits on both sides and which brings me
to the last question of why is B still
in office uh after more than 15 years uh
serving as prime minister even no
consecutive I'd like to say a word on on
polls before I come to that because I
want to take a ride on Mr mayor's uh
question um and just one line on the
Palestinian side and two on ours on the
Palestinian side I would say that at the
time that the Palestinian Authority was
functioning properly under the
leadership of uh finance minister and
then prime minister Salam
fayad Palestinian public held it in high
regard at the time that there was a
dynamic peace process Hamas was not
popular the PA
was when you take the two
together and both are gone proper
governance is gone and peace process is
gone it's no wonder that
Palestinian Vote or Express them s in
support of whoever fights against the
occupation
conveniently they deny the atrocities
happen and I see that as a positive
atrocity but they like the idea that
somebody is trying to do something about
occupation we're not going to forget the
atrocities but politically analytically
speaking that's an interesting point on
the Israeli side I say that the most
striking development in the PO to
me and is totally counter Logic for
me is that a slice of the pie of Israeli
body politic that I call the
lunatics which is the combination of the
Messianic
annexationist the Jewish supremacist
all the extreme right and their lunatic
agenda has not expended a bit since
October
7 I must confess that I had expected a
completely different picture with
Israelis on mass sliding in the
direction of forget it let's Annex it
let's expel them Let's do an ethnic
cleansing which is the agenda of the
extreme right it has not gained 1% in
the poll as compared to October
6 what did happen to the
pragmatists those who supported either
two-state solution or the slower
approach which is commonly called
separation gradual
separation they did not move to the
other side of the annexation is they
moved to the don't
know which Al Al makes a lot of sense
when you are frightened when you are
angry when you feel betrayed by your own
government when you're
confused you still don't lose the basic
Foundation of your
realization that these two peoples one
day will have to separate lest we bleed
each other until we do come to our
senses
um as to
corporation uh look I'm uh I'm
prejudiced um having served for about a
decade in the prime minister's office
and having walked those corridors
since I believe more in
leadership as triggering a
change uh than bottom up I may be wrong
it may be my personal
predisposition
bias but I look back just like simmer
mentioned uh the change in Palestinian
public opinion overnight when leadership
changed position from one state to the
riv of the sea to two State solution
same happened here two weeks before
President Sarat arrived in
Jerusalem the majority of Israelis were
opposed vehemently to giving up the
Sinai in return for a peace treaty two
weeks later it was a flip side of that
majority supported uh a deal with Egypt
so yeah the West Bank is different than
Egypt and everything is different and
everything is different and yet so much
is the same in terms of human nature as
Netanyahu well on the one hand I'm proud
of our democratic system uh that we we
do not except for
once tragically for some and for me and
for all of us when our prime minister
was replaced by a bullet rather than the
ballot
Rin uh other than that we do that in a
in a democratic way I believe that the
forces of
change uh are there that the process may
take may take
a little longer than we wish but the
scenarios by which this government is
gone and this prime minister and it his
last
tenure uh there are about half a dozen
scenarios of how it might come about I
will not belabor it it has to do with
the indor secrecies of the Israel
complicated political system uh but but
I believe that uh that this government
is done the only question is how fast
it's going to happen and how much damage
does okay um very
interesting ending comment from Nimrod
we hope this um government does
not does not inflict irreparable damage
uh and I'll just I I will keep the rest
of my opinion out of it because we have
more questions we have some terrific
questions uh the first is from uh Karen
horn from the University of
Massachusetts USA obviously and she
would like to hear from both of you
there's an organization called a land
for
all um which um is putting forth the
notion of uh two states but sharing the
land land sharing sovereignty sharing
Jerusalem kind of a shared
concept
um um and in
the prior years we had proponents of
this
um um we had um the uh what minority
plan from
unscop and we had in the 1920s the
breach shalom karski and um we had U
other similar proponents of this kind of
notion in from the 1920s
1930s uh and 1940s UDA Magnus proposed
this in his testimony to the Anglo
American Committee in
1946 for example so wondering what you
think about that and then we have a
question about the Israeli economy which
I would ask both of you um to uh
address uh um and this is from Nancy
Kaplan who lives in Michigan
USA and she indicates the the Israeli
economy is in not such great shape right
now we've had downgrades from the credit
rating agencies and so forth and she's
taking an interesting angle here she's
asking uh if um the current government
doesn't take steps to improve the
economy and it doesn't seem like they
are uh she says what if hrup gets in
involved at the behest of the
protesters who were coming to kapan
every Saturday night might this have an
impact on bringing down the Coalition or
perhaps convincing enough leud ministers
to defect um so I will ask both of you
to think about that um
and uh I have one additional question
from
myself
Samir talked about Oslo nimro talked
about Oslo
the uh I went back and
reread the
Accords uh recently in connection with
the different project I'm working on and
I was just so struck by exchange of
letters between Robin and Arafat 9
September
1993 the Declaration of principles four
days later the interim agreement in 1995
Samir mentioned the gods of Jericho
agreement the
uh uh Mahmud Abbas was the chief
negotiator at least for the dop he wrote
a book about it he talked in the book in
1997 about how
intensively both sides
negotiated and yet we're sitting here um
unfortunately 31 years
later declaring the Oslo Accords a dead
letter even though neither side is
formally revoked or ended and so what
lessons do we take from Oslo what
lessons do we take from Oslo as we think
about the future possibilities of
Israelis and Palestinians working
together so that's our next round of
questions uh Su back to you um take as
long as you'd like to answer one or more
of the questions and then nro I'll come
back to you maybe we'll have time for
one more round we'll see how it goes
some over to you
please what I think the men Len
that we can't take from Oso is that if
we don't have a political process that
comes out of a
democratic steps internally inside the
Palestinian uh Society it it will lead
to a lot of
problems and this bring us to the
question that I couldn't answer uh toout
the the first round of questions
why is is still Netanyahu there for me
Netanyahu and Abbas
are direct reasons that led us to the
7th of
October for Abbas canceling the
elections the Palestinian general
2021 he
has prevented a democratic change of
leadership had we had the elections of
202 21 we could have a different kind of
leadership a different kind of
regimes governing the West Bank and Gaza
and this could have been enough to
prevent the 7th of October without the
poison money from Qatar that Netanyahu
allowed to go smoothly to
Hamas we could have prevented this EV of
October both of them are directly
involved on the thousands of lives that
we have lost on both sides of of of of
the borders of
Gaza
and we breath some fresh air when
President Biden in in November has
emphasized the importance of
revitalizing the
PA we we we we had a lot of Hope but
unfortunately this hope turned into
disappointment when the silly cosmetic
steps taken by President Abbas in
appointing a new prime minister were
accepted by the American and Biden
Administration I would like here to give
two metaphorical images on how I see the
situation why Abbas is the most
important issue now for us as
Palestinians and why the step of
changing a prime minister with another
he he fired Muhammad and appointed
another
Muhammad he fired a Muhammad that was a
better Diplomat and less corrupt and
appointed Muhammad Mustafa that is less
Diplomat and worse corrupt person even
he does not live physically in the west
mammad Mustafa lives with his family in
Jordan he comes Sunday morning and
leaves Thursday
afternoon physically he does not live
here it's
like you have a very beautiful woman
that was hit by a car she's bleeding in
the street and instead of calling the
ambulance to rescue her to take her to
the hospital you are calling
the makeup stylist to come and fix her
ha makeup Palestinians don't need
cosmetics they need change in
leadership they need a Democratic
Leadership transparent
accountable if a leadership fails to
respect internally the rights of its
people how can they represent these
rights in front of the other it doesn't
work and I explained to my Palestinian
colleagues why changing abas is a
priority even to the issue of handling
the the the conflict with Israel and I
give another
metaphorical image if if somebody that
has a problem with you comes and put
your own house on
fire and your own family your kids are
trapped in the fire inside your home and
you bring a pipe of water and try to put
down the fire and then your own father
comes and closes the water who is your
real Challenge and enemy at that moment
it's not the one who burned your house
it's your own father that is preventing
the water that can save your your family
that's what Abbas is is is doing he's
blocking all the roads and this is
leaving us in the continuous circle of
of
uncertainty
so we we we don't have unfortunately the
the same tools that the Israeli is have
if the his decides to strike and they
have done it March
2023 after the firing of of of
Galant Netanyahu
bent he couldn't resisted we don't have
these tools Abbas is controlling
everything and unfortunately currently
he's so much
protected by the
security services in Israel and the CIA
in in the USA both believe mistakenly
that he is the pillar for the security
stability in the West Bank and I wonder
where is the security stability in the
West Bank he hardly controls the center
of of three cities ramala betlehem and
Jericho nothing else he's a ticking bomb
C situation he's not a pillar of any
security and the only way to have this
change is to convince the whole
International Community especially the
American Administration and the Israeli
security apparatus that he is not an
asset he's a burden and they should
allow a
change um I did want to ask though Samar
did you want to address the um um the
the first question about a land for all
or would you rather if you could just
talk about that that for a minute or two
and then I'll turn it over to Nimrod
please okay well first I would like to
comment on the pictures that you that
Nimrod has in his house I think I
discovered now that we have common
friends like Muhammad dlan Muhammad dlan
is an amazing Palestinian leader I think
he's the one that now everybody is
expecting to do the change on the
Palestinian side and I think he is also
a one that can Le connect all the all
the dotts especially if we are the only
way to be able to find a way out for the
Israeli Army from Gaza is to bring the
Saudis and try to talk about very
concrete security Regional Arrangements
where Arabs are responsible and
guaranteeing any kind of
healthy and friendly relation between
the new Gaza and and and Israel we don't
need only to revitalize the PA we need
to revitalize the fat we need to
revitalize the Palestinian and the
Palestinian Society this is the way that
we can achieve the change that we are
looking for for for the land for all it
I I know about this U initiatives for me
I think
Palestinians are open to any kind of
land for all one state two State 20
States we leave this for the Israelis
let the Israelis negotiate among
themselves which path they prefer for us
we don't want the current situation of a
two floor state to
continue one floor for a noble floor for
the Masters and the other floor is for
servants this situation should end and
there is a matter of
urgency so one 2 20 land for all
whatever I think it's not smart that we
continue alone each side
thinking about options it's better that
we come together the political Elites
should come together in one room and
start discussing what can be the
choices that can have
51% of Palestinians and Israelis
supported it's very complicated we might
not be able now to have a situation
where most of Israelis will welcome I
think from my knowledge on the Israeli
side there is a very big block inside
Israel which is Center left that
believes Israelis should SE be separated
from Palestinians but they are not
confident that this separation and
creating a Palestinian state or a
Palestinian entity will not end by
having another terrorist state that is
having a a security threat towards
Israel so they prefer to leave this
issue for another 34 years until they
are more confident the other block which
is center right or a little bit more to
the right would prefer to Annex to
forget about
Gaza and Annex the West Bank or most of
the West Bank but they are not confident
that the Americans were supported now so
they prefer to postpone this another 30
40
years I'm not
sure what can be acceptable to the
Israelis now but I am sure that if we
start working together we will be able
to find a way
that will satisfy both Israelis and
Palestinians and there are plenty of
ways without going into the details the
political will and the political
atmosphere the the climate we need to
create the climate that allows the
Palestinians and Israelis to accept some
kind of arrangements we are lacking this
it needs leadership this is the the
first step that we should achieve create
the political Elite on both sides that
are willing to put an end to this
conflict thank you um and thanks for
addressing that uh NE wrot over to you
we have about 20 minutes left we do have
a few more questions that came in um so
uh if you could go for maybe no more
than 10 minutes then I'll quickly cover
those last couple questions give each of
you five minutes to cover that and then
we'll come to the end so Nimrod the
floor is yours thanks um in the order of
their presentation to Karen's question
regarding lent for for all um I'm in
favor of any formula uh that will be
accepted by the two peoples but I don't
believe and and a second uh qualifier uh
no uh agreement between Israelis and
Palestinians uh will be um um will
trigger a strict
separation um cutting off all
communication contact interaction
between the two people that's just not
going to happen it's not realistic in
terms of uh human relations as well as
in terms of
infrastructure environment water
whatever what what have you uh the two
assuming we get to the point that we
have a two-state solution uh the two
states uh will have a a a rich web of
cooporation uh however I do believe that
it is far more realistic to expect
Israelis to endorse at the outset uh a
very clear division of the
land what Barak used to call we are here
they are there because of the very
reasons that Samir mentioned which is
fear and concerns and uncertainty about
the future so the combination of robust
security arrangements to which the
Palestinians have long
agreed um with uh the the the the clear
boundary and uh and and Border regime uh
between the two countries I think will
be something that Israelis will insist
upon in order to support the concept
uh to Nancy U you almost read my mind um
yeah um the one of the scenarios that I
did not spell out uh is indeed that the
moment comes when Israel is
internalized that the
purposeful phase of the war is
over and we are stuck in a open-ended
attrition war and that will be the
moment that Israelis will be less
reluctant to to go to the
street today there is still a reluctance
our children are fighting in Gaza and in
the north it's not legitimate and
therefore the protest is
substantial but not nothing close to
what we saw last year when we had an
explosion of pro democ democracy energy
in protecting our Democratic
institutions against the government ass
so um I
assume that the
cumulative anger sense of
betrayal um and the and the
conviction that those responsible must
go uh will bring about a similar
explosion of democratic energy in the
streets and I think that the hist will
join uh and that will bring the economy
to a Hal and no government will be able
to sustain an early elections will be
called for that's probably the most
likely scenario even though there are
others as
well and now to Steve's question uh
about the lessons of of
Oslo um I would say that U my primary
lessons and and you know Oslo was
launched by the NGO that you mentioned
that I've been the chairman and now
senior associate
ECF uh under the leadership of Yi baing
at the time and still um and uh there
were two mistakes built into to the
agreement one was that the end game was
not
defined nowhere does it say that it
should lead to a two-state solution that
was I think a very big mistake and
two um the issue of
settlements was not insisted upon by the
Palestinian and I regret that very very
much because nothing presents a greater
impediment to a future agreement than
the uh expansion of
settlements um but there was a third
element and here is a story that is not
well known uh shortly after Oslo um when
we saw that there was
no reaction of the kind that we feared
that streets will go up in Fire and that
the country will just go crazy I mean
how dare you recognize the PLO that
bunch of uh of terrorists and so
on um and we saw that it didn't happen
yeah there was some protest but it was
really contained and limited and and and
legitimate um we went to uh to the prime
minister to to um Rabin and we said why
don't you uh Yosi bin went to him um and
said why don't you give me a mandate to
negotiate a permanent framework for
permanent agreement now not in five
years from now but now let let let let's
let's
exploit the
effect of Hope for the
majority and shock for the extreme
minority and let's take it all the way
and Rabin was not willing to do it now
as we did as Yosi did with Oslo so he
did with the permanent status without
permission and without
Authority um he uh started a negotiation
of a of a framework agreement for for
for permanent stat for permanent
status um I was privileged to be on the
team that negotiated Abu maazin was on
the other side of course like in Osa and
you see on our side uh small team
negotiated and we reached a framework
agreement uh the framework agreement now
known as the B
abuin document or whatever footnote to
history for one small
tragedy Yosi was supposed to present it
toin on the Sunday after the Saturday
where he was assassinated
yeah what if yeah yeah okay we have a
really interesting question all the
questions are great by the way and I
want to thank the audience profoundly
for your wonderful and thoughtful
questions here is a question from
Muhammad schani from
Jordan this is very interesting he's
asking both of
you what advice would both of you give
countries and even to the superpowers in
world who want to be part of the
solution rather than the problem what
advice would you give them what do you
need from them what can they do to help
both of you and we have a few other
questions that are also very important
but for lack of time I think we'll defer
those questions I think Mr shani's
question is so important I'd like to
just put that as the last one to both of
you five minutes each please and then
we'll hand over to Professor Spiegel to
wrap
up uh and let me start uh somewh with
you and then nro will or nro would you
like to go first go ahead then we'll
yeah I'm eager I'm eager to respond to
general sm's question and good to hear
from you
General um and I'll be very specific I
think General span was was looking for
something broader but I'm going to be
very specific
I think Israelis are not aware of the
fact that the reason that that um the
the the
offer of the
region under the leadership of President
Biden of those three wins that I
mentioned at the outset for
Israel uh a way out of Gaza a change of
Dynamics on the West Bank and with the
Palestinians overall and Regional
integration that all of them stand on
two legs which is yes to rejuvenated
Palestinian Authority running both Gaza
and the West Bank and the political
Horizon leading to a two-state solution
Israelis don't know that the composition
of their current government is depriving
them of this historic
opportunity what I would like to see
from the region in
Washington is the closest equivalent to
a Sadat
moment we cannot have again a Sadat
moment when the president of Egypt shows
up in Jerusalem and turns
Israeli uh uh positions 180 degrees
overnight by his Persona by his gesture
and by his
message but we can do something that is
close to that
where President
Biden and the Saudi Crown Prince known
as
MBS and maybe this the emirati leader
mbz and maybe the king of Morocco and
maybe the King of Jordan and maybe the
president of Egypt jointly or separately
find a way to convey the message
directly to the Israeli public over the
head of the Israeli leadership spelling
out the op
options not dictating anything telling
Israel is look you're all grown-ups it's
core if you like Gaza
enjoy but if you
don't here is what we offer you and here
is what you have to do in order to get
our
offer my advice for the region in
Washington is to create that Moment of
clarity for the Israeli public
which will resonate in the
region which will I think affect
mood it will certainly accelerate the
sense of Israelis of the need for a
change in
Jerusalem okay great okay sumir last
words from you no more than five minutes
please and we'll end right on
time well I totally agree with Nimrod I
I think this what should be done a
surprise visit by Biden mbz MBS the
Moroccan King the Jordanian King to the
KET addressing the Israelis because what
also Nimrod has said at the beginning
that the Israelis are still on the 7th
of October they did not move 200 days
ahead we need to shift one of their eyes
towards the fruit future currently both
their eyes are still stuck in the past
on the 7th of October when you open the
TV channel they are still discussing the
stories of the families of of of the
envelope of Gaza until today so we need
to shift one eyes and it needs something
very powerful I would like to add to
what nrod has
said also to the USA and to the
jordanians since gener smani has
addressed
uh the question start opening your doors
to the opposition inside the
Palestinians you are talking only to
Abbas you are talking to a dead person
that is totally disconnected to the
reality that has lost completely the
support of the Palestinian people open
your doors the same way that President
Biden has invited Gans to Washington DC
as a message to push change in the
Israeli side he must invite the moderate
pragmatic more responsible more
representable Palestinian opposition
from the Palestinians and open the doors
in Washington DC and start talking also
a man needs to go out of the books out
of the classical traditional relation of
sticking talking to the those who have
the title The the situation in the West
Bank does not allow any more tolerance
in the current situation A Change must
be accepted and endorsed by by by the
region and to the Israeli public I would
like to have a final message the only
way that can we can respect and honor
The Souls of the people that lost their
lives on the 7th of October the
Palestinians who have lost their lives
in Gaza is by achieving peace it is only
the only way that we can respect all
those rest who are still living and even
all those who will be born for
Palestinians and Israelis peace is the
only way that we can respect both our
people it is the choice of the
courageous people and we need to start
thinking in the vision for the future
imagine that a Palestinian state will be
the most powerful Ally to Israel imagine
that a moment of threat from the
Iranians like what has happened in the
past days where the Jordanian Army was
in Disguise also protecting imagine that
Palestine will be also playing a role to
defend the region and to defent Israelis
when it is needed this is the thing that
we need to work to to and it is
achievable and doable we just need to
shift one eye towards the future and see
happening okay thank you so much and you
began uh this evening Summer by
emphasizing the need for each side to
understand and appreciate the other
side's narrative and I think that that
is also an extraordinarily important
observation and both of you demonstrated
that this evening I want to thank you
both very very much I will remind our
audience that it is now almost half past
midnight where both of you are we are so
appreciative and I see Professor Spiegel
is about to come back on in a moment and
I speak for him as well we are greatly
appreciative to both of you for being
willing to participate in this webinar
uh at such a late hour of the evening
for both of you thank you both very very
much thank you to the audience for your
terrific questions and I will now hand
over to Professor Spiegel to wrap up
thank you yes I agree so much uh that we
all
appreciate what you were saying and what
we don't hear
very much and and either one of you or
both of you would like to write
something up uh I would be glad to uh uh
to publish it uh the Notions of a Moment
clarity uh the moment of Beyond October
7th although
obviously uh the people who are still in
Gaza who don't want to be there must
come out and the divisions uh
on both sides um there is a history
when uh there was Terror and horror and
death but at least something came out of
it uh and that has to be repeated and
and so I found this uh session very
important very meaningful and it tells
me that we have to do more and more uh
in our uh
programs uh I'd like uh very much uh to
thank our team for creating this
opportunity uh for us to talk today it's
not easy uh these days to Manny Jad of
course to Salam mahajer to Emily pistoi
and to Laura Lee the four people who
work in uh California
uh to make uh everything we do possible
and we have such great uh a feeling for
them uh I'm going to go from the past
hour and a half to the Future now uh and
uh uh seman has quite a bit to offer in
the next few weeks we hope you will
return for these vital elements shared
on the screen and we have even more that
I'm going to be able to talk now but let
me talk about next week May 1st women in
Conflict voices resilience and
solutions uh will be our uh discussion
our panel of experts from Israel
Palestine Sudan and Syria uh will share
the stories of women impacted by
conflict in the Mina region providing
insight into the diverse roles they play
from Frontline activism to behind the
scenes
peacemaking sounds quite intriguing to
me and I look forward uh to hearing it
and on Thursday May 16th
Sudan uh the Lesser known war which is
not getting the kind of attention uh it
should we are trying uh to change that
to change that join us to learn the
latest on the state of the year-long war
and Sudan the country's humanitarian
situation and the international
community's efforts to stop it and
obviously not enough if you have not
already joined our mailing list please
add your
name uh the link is on the screen uh or
send a message to us at CAD you see it
there at
international.
ucla.edu
uh let me say that again because I don't
see it uh but that's maybe my fault
um uh CAD
cmed
so we hope to see you soon as we move on
and uh encouraged by today's uh
discussion move on as faster and uh uh
with more effort than ever so let me say